CHUNG TAI CHAN MONASTERY

A couple of points as I continue my reports on the trip to visit Taiwan. First of all, let me clarify that the entire cost of the trip for me, including spending cash, was due to the generosity of some very wonderful people. It did not cost me a penny (or other units of currency). Even though the trip was physically hard on me, as well as emotionally difficult to some extent on both June on me, the amount of learning for me (and, I like to think, some little contributions I was able to make) definitely made it worth it.
Second, one purpose of the trip included visiting with local Christians, some of them converts from Buddhism, which--as in most parts of the world that declares itself to be ever-so-tolerant--can bear a painful price tag. We made some great contacts, but for the most part I will not discuss those visits.
Third, if you're waiting for stories on what we did for fun, you apparently never took my regular world religions class (before my energy started to give out), and so you aren't aware of the fact there is nothing more fun for me than visiting temples (. . . well, and playing music and watching auto races and doing web sites . . . ). Anyway, we spent an enormous amount of time just traveling back and forth, and I used a lot of that time for zombying out. We did not go surfing or rock climbing.
A number of the local highways led through tunnels. These conveniences of transportation have, however, raised some serious opposition from citizens in a traditional Chinese mode of thinking. You see, a mountain represents a dragon, and a tunnel that goes right through it would break the backbone of the dragon, which is a bad idea, both for the dragon himself and for the larger world whose balance is being upset by the loss of dragons.
|
|
| Bodhidharma |
Now, then, our next temple was the huge Chung Tai temple. It fit the pattern of most of the places we visited: it was built recently under the guidance of a contemporary leader. In this case, it was a man named Wei Chueh, in the direct succession of Zen masters, going back to the remarkable Bodidharma who brough Zen (Chan) to China and whose spiritual genealogy can be traced back to Mahakasyapa, the Buddha's first successor and presumably also the first patriarch of Zen. Wei Chueh founded a separate monastery in 1987 and this place in 2001. As you can see by the pictures, they are doing quite well. Over the last twenty years, more than 15,000 monks and nuns have received full ordination from him. These are roughly the same figures we heard in the context of other new Buddhist orders in Taiwan.
Our guide was a nun who went by the name of "Simplicity," who turned out to be originally from Hanover, Germany. She took us up all thirty-two floors of the temple; fortunately most of the stages were accessible by elevator. Regular visitors and worshipers were only allowed on the first floor, which contained most of the normal statues, some of which I'll come back to shortly. It included the representation of the earthly Buddha (Sakyamuni) depicted below. Then on the second floor there was a statue of the Buddha's spiritual body, much larger and more impressive. Occupying stories nine through fifteen was the Buddha's Dharma body, a huge all-white statue that leaves you breathless, even if you take the elevator and not the stairs. Going further up, there is a pagoda dedicated to the Medicine Buddha. It would be a large building just if it were standing by itself outside; here it is a large building occupying the top floors of a huge building. It is constructed entirely of wood without any nails.
The globe on the very top is dedicated to all Bodhisattvas. As an interesting by-product of the spherical construction, if you stand in the very center of the room and speak, you can hear your voice as it would be heard by other people. There is no particular religious significance to this phenomenon, and if you don't like the sound of your own voice, it's an annoyance.
|
|
|
|
| Mahakasyapa | Sakyamuni | Ananda |
Let me come back to the statues on the bottom level. Many depictions of the various Buddhas have them accompanied by two Bodhisattvas. In the case of Sakyamuni (Siddhartha Gautama, the "regular" Buddha), these are often two of his first disciples, Mahakasyapa and Ananda. We already mentioned the former, who assumed leadership after the Buddha's death and is considered the first patriarch of Zen. According to the tradition, Ananda had not yet found enlightenment by the time of Buddha's death because he was too hung up on intellectual questions. He was supposed to have had a tape-recorder-like memory. Mahakasyapa finally brought him to the point of realization, and Ananda eventually became the second patriarch. Ananda is credited with being the source of much of the enormous collection of the Buddha's teachings, called the "Three Baskets." This brings us to the so-called Pali canon, of which I can tell you next time because it was, in fact, an unplanned destination on one of our excursions.

The Bodhisattva Temple
| |
|
| The Boddhisattva Temple | Guanin and Amithaba at the front of the temple. |
|
|
|
| Airborne Guanin | Prince Siddhartha in contemplation. |
| | |
| The Venerable Master Huei Guang | |
The first temple we visited in the Taichung area was undoubtedly the most personal. As you can see in the picture, it occupied a little niche on a busy street. I removed (by the magic of Paintshop Pro) a huge light pole in order to give you a decent picture of the building, which very evidently is simultaneously serving as growth facility for various species of vegetation. The external botany makes for a great effect from the inside, though, such as with the picture-window like front of the temple. You are looking at the guilded figure of Guanin (Kuan-Yin) in front of the standing Buddha Amithaba.
For those who are new to this world, Guanin is a Chinese folk legend, who became known as the goddess of mercy. When Buddhism came to China, her identity was merged with that of the Bodhisattva of Mercy, who has been known by the snappy name of Avalokitesvara. (I doubt that his name gets butchered all that much more than, say, "Winfried," does.) Just as I had seen before in Hong Kong and Singapore, here in Taiwan also the two names and personalities were interchanged freely. In other words, when people were not intending to be technically accurate, they might easily refer to a representation of the male Avalokitesvara as Guanin, or they might also speak of a Guanin statue as Avalokitesvara. Please note the picture of the clever depiction of Guanin on a cloud on the external stairwell.
Furthermore, as long as we're addressing the basics, I trust my well-informed readers (a redundancy, to be sure) know that there are numerous Buddhas in the various schools of Buddhism. Amithaba, supervisor of the Western quadrant of the universe and artisan of the much-desired Pure Land, is one of the most popular ones.
Then there was the statue of a person whose legs were not in the lotus position, and whose finger was pointing at his cheek. It is common knowledge that the various hand positions (mudras) and other bodily attitudes of Eastern divinities have specific meanings, and so it is in this case. A statue under this description represents Prince Siddhartha after his chariot ride, agonizing over his impending decision to leave the palace and seek enlightenment.
The Master of this small temple was the Venerable Huei Guang. At one time he was a science major at a university in the United States, felt called late in his studies to go into religion and philosophy, but decided to finish his science major before enrolling in seminary (in other words, his early educational biography was very similar to mine). After several years as monk in the order of Fo Guang Shan (see last Friday's entry), he launched this new project, and he appears to be very popular. However, note the sword-like tool at his side. This is the instrument with which the master slaps his student meditators if they accidentally fall asleep during meditation practice.
After an hour or so of good personal conversation, we came to the usual exchange of gifts at the end of such a visit. Wyatt had come to Taiwan prepared with a number of nicely wrapped Bibles, which would be one of our standard presents. Master Huei Guang had just mentioned that he had never read the Bible, and that he dearly wished he had one, when Wyatt handed him one. We broke Chinese custom and encouraged him to open the package right then and there, which he did, and you can see the result on his face. It had been a long, long time since I have seen anyone so genuinely excited to receive a Bible. May the Word of God exercise its power in his life and his ongoing search for truth.
(Just in case you're wondering, we each received a shirt from the temple.)
WHILE I WAS GONE . . .
. . . some good things came out. Or should that be the other way around: while I was out, some good things came in? Anyway, between reports on events in Taiwan, please allow me to mention quickly, a few items that happened on the publications front. The Pocket Guide to World Religions went into its third printing. In contrast to other publishers, InterVarsity Press always treats a new printing as a minor celebration and sends the author a newly printed copy with a little congratulatory note. But much more fun with regards to the Pocket Guide was the fact that waiting for me at home was also the Spanish translation of the book. Apparently it came out in June or so, but IVP hadn't been able to acquire samples to send to the authors of the Pocket Guide series. Furthermore, James Sire's fifth edition of his Universe Next Door was officially published. (Taylor students and graduates may recognize it as one of the original sources for the "Foundations" course, previously known as "Freshman Seminar." The book and course have grown apart from each other to a certain extent; Mark Cosgrove, of course, has now published his notes in book form, and you can find them under the title of Foundations of Christian Thought at ChristianBooksBibles.com.) Anyway, over the years, Jim Sire has added quite a bit of material to his book, and some of you may remember that I wrote a chapter on Islamic theism for it during my last year of teaching. It didn't rate mention on the front cover, but it's there as chapter 10 of the work. Let me repeat, as I did a while back, that it is an honor to have been allowed to make a contribution to that classic work.

That's all for tonight. Oh, okay, I'll throw in a couple of pictures of Taiwan, just to keep the mood going. You see here a composite, cleverly stitched together by your skilled, but humble, bloggist. Seasoned travelers will undoubtedly recognize the little plaza outside of the train station of Taichung.

The Medicine Buddha in LA
Our trip to learn about Buddhism in Taiwan began in L.A. Not too far from Biola University (though undoubtedly not connected) there is a Buddhist temple, finished in 1988. When I say "temple," I mean "temple complex," a number of buildings, halls, and exhibitions on what is a virtual Disneyland of Buddhism. Wait! Make that "Hsing Yun Land," and you're not far from the reality.
The actual name of the temple is "Hsi Lai," which means "Coming West" or "Moving West," an appropriate name for this mission from the East to the West. From a material point of view, it definitely seems to be a success. What we saw there is a phenomenon we encountered all along the way: a revised or adapted form of Buddhism that maintains traditional forms of thought and practice, but attempts simultaneously to appeal to a twenty-first century outlook. This particular order is called Fo Guang Shan (Buddha's Mountain of Light), and, like most Chinese Buddhism today, its roots straddle early Chan (Zen) and early Pure Land Buddhism. But don't confuse these Chinese versions with their later Japanese offspring. This order was convoked by a monk named Hsing Yun in 1967, and its goal has been to establish a Pure Land on earth. ("I really am for world peace!")
|
|
|
| The Official Gate | Welcome to "Moving West" |
|
|
|
| Some of the "Sixteen Arhats" | "Hero Hall" (The Main Shrine) |
|
| |
| Amitayus, the "Medicine Buddha" | |
For me the most intriguing item of interest was the importance of the "Medicine Buddha." As is true for most Dhyani Buddhas, his role in Buddhism is highly variable, depending on geographical setting and historical linkages. In the context of this particular tradition, he is called Amitayus, and he is the Buddha of the East, corresponding to Amithaba, who created the Pure Land of the West. In other contexts, e.g. Tibetan Buddhism, Amitayus is a projective form of Amithaba, while the Eastern quadrant of the universe is governed by Akshobya, who built his own Pure Land of the East, providing a second opportunity alongside that given by Amithaba. Regardless of his identification in the mythology, there is no question that the Medicine Buddha plays an important role in the lives of the common people. He is usually pictured holding an object associated with immortality: a pagoda, a bowl filled with an elixir, or an orb.
I decided on this, our first temple visit as a team, to be totally honest and let Wyatt and Ncho know as soon as I was too tired to go on and set up a pattern that I would find a place to rest while they could move along further to associated museums, gift shops, or whatever. We were able to maintain that practice pretty much the whole trip, for which I was very thankful.
MADE IN TAIWAN
Those who have hung around my blog for a while know that I tend not to advertise overseas trips indiscriminately in advance. Sorry if you're disappointed, let alone upset, if you got left out of the loop, which has a rather short diameter, but there are several strong reasons for it. For those of you who knew, thanks for your thoughts and prayer support. The objective of the trip was to visit a plethora of Buddhist temples in Taiwan and to talk to converts from Buddhism to Christianity. The team consisted of Wyatt, who is my friend and has been my companion on several previous trips abroad, Ntchotchi (hereafter: "Ncho") along with her husband Intchutchuna (hereafter: "Nchi"). Oh yeah, you might not find them listed under those names listed in the phone book either. I'm not meaning to be overdramatic (if I were, I would have to disguise my identity also and not publish any pictures), but just following some basic measures for publishing something unrestricted on the web. In Taiwan, we were joined on most days by Wa-ta-wa (hereafter "Wa"), a Buddhist college professor, who opened many a door for us.
For tonight, I will just give a quick summary and a few introductory pictures. After spending a couple of days in Los Angeles, we enjoyed a 14 ½ hour flight to Taipei, which we followed up immediately with a five-hour bus ride down to Tainan, our headquarters for the next week or so. Since most of our locations were around Taichung, we did quite a bit of commuting by train each day. Then we went to Hualien by way of Taipei (the quick way of getting there), and finally spent our last few days in Taipei.
The trip was physically demanding, but everyone was looking out for me: making sure I was taking my meds, eating enough fruits and vegetables, and taking rests whenever possible.
Taiwan is an intrinsically beautiful island, though in all candor I must say that much of the industrialized part of the west coast has taken on a somewhat disappointing resemblance to New Jersey with palm trees. Nevertheless, much of the rest of it makes up in aesthetic appeal. At that, I need to apologize for some of my pictures in advance. Due to the virtually ever-present haze, photography became a little difficult at times. In some cases, I've left the view as it was; in others I've enhanced it subsequently when I've wanted you to see details, creating a little bit of a spinach effect for the greenery. You may substitute other vegetables of your choice as you see fit.
|
|
| |
| Ncho and Nchi | Chung Tai Temple | |
|
|
| |
| Wyatt | Wa-Ta-Wa | Your Bloggist |
Coming up among other things: what it's like to eat with the monks in their monastery, why calligraphy is not my strength, the difference between Pali and Sanskrit, and some thoughts on the "emergent temple."

Lots of stories to come!
140/82. That was my blood pressure when the nurse took it at Dr. W's on Thursday. A little high on the upper number. She also took my pulse and possibly my respiration, and I'm pretty sure those were positive numbers as well. Furthermore, similar numbers no doubt have continued to obtain since then. I'm only mentioning this to clarify that these numerical expressions are frequently referred to as vital signs, and so I am inferring that I am still alive, though you couldn't tell by my supposedly daily blog.
Simply put, it's been an emotionally rough few days. The retirement celebration last week definitely brought home a lot of closure. Closure is good. In fact, if only one half of what people said and wrote about me is true (and I don't see why they would lie), I can look back on a pretty decent career at Taylor. But that's just it: looking back. Closure closes. As Captain Picard said, "I am looking at more days behind me than ahead of me," though I don't have the regrets that he did in Generations. Nevertheless, suddenly the reality has become more real (subjectively speaking of course; metaphysically that would be incoherent).
A similar feeling arose out of that appointment with Dr. W. It was a good one, kind of funny in its own way, I suppose. After a solid exam by an intern, Dr. W then entered together with the intern and another doctor as well as Leo, the super-social-worker. She ran through some of the same tests as the intern did and then pointed out certain features of my condition (ratcheting and lead -piping) in some places, which everyone (well, the intern and practicing doctor) then tried out as well. I definitely felt like a guinea pig. Of course, I thrive on attention, so that's not a bad thing. My point is that we are now far past the point of "what" and are now looking at "where" and "how much." So, again, the reality just really hit me.
There are also the other realities of life, which will hopefully vanish as soon as the InterVarsity royalty check makes it to our door. 'Nuff said on that. Bottom line: I've been pretty depressed, paradoxically triggered by some things (e.g. the retirement celebration) that are actually incredibly uplifting. The human psyche is a strange thing.
In other personal news, the Alexandria Worsels are now at 4 and 2.
There are some really exciting things coming up very shortly, but--as long-standing readers know--I don't usually mention specifics ahead of time. However, it is possible that due to those upcoming events the blog will continue to be fairly sporadic. Regardless, both the survey of Islamic groups and the slow walk through 1 Kings will most likely be on hold and give way to some personal narrations. We shall see.
Cuneiform Numbers
June's visit with Dr. N went fine. There were some test results of several months ago that we had never received word on, and they were all okay. Dr. N and I had a brief exchange concerning Ahmadiyya Islam. He's one of the people that I think of whenever evangelicals engage in what I consider to be "bridge-burning" actions with regard to Muslims. Trust is very, very hard to earn and can be lost all-too-quickly.
Today is the 13th. 13 is supposedly an unlucky number, which is allegedly derived from the Babylonian system of numbers. I know that this is conventional wisdom, but I'm just a little skeptical. The Babylonian number system was based on the number 60. Depending on its position, a single downstroke could mean either mean 1, 60, or 3,600, as the picture shows. So, everything from 1 to 59 goes into the first box, everything from 60 to 3,599 into the second one, and so forth.
So, how would you write the number 13? This is where it gets funny because there is a special symbol for 10; consequently there must be some kind of decimal hunch underlying the otherwise sexagesimal system. The depiction for 10 reminds me of an angel fish. If you've ever had an aquarium, you may have had one of them swallow up all your neons.
So, if you want to write 13, you write the symbol for 10, link three 1's together, and combine them.
However, you must be sure to keep all your symbols in the far right box. Otherwise, you get the wrong number. Just by itself, the sign could mean either 13 or 780 or something even higher, so it needs to be in the right position. Location is everything.

There's only one problem. To the best of my knowledge, when the Babylonians scratched with their styli into the wax tablets or cylinders, they didn't have any boxes. So, then, how did they indicate position for their numerals? They invented a placeholder sign, which eventually took the place of our zero. It looked a little like a slanted π. And thus, the happy outcome was that it was now possible to avoid having your calculations accidentally be off by 767.

None of which says anything about why 13 should be an unlucky number. In Chinese culture, the number 8 is considered to be lucky because its pronunciation is a lot like the word for "good fortune," and number 4 has the misfortune of sounding somewhat like "misfortune." I know of no such explanation for 13 in Babylonian, though my Akkadian is extremely weak. Still, I had fun learning about Babylonian numerals, and I hope you did, too.
Just one of those days. Tonight as we were watching TV, I was doing something on this computer, and when I had some modicum of success, I said, "Praise God!" or words along that line. June asked, "Did you get something to work?" Put the stress on the something, and the question summarizes how most of the day has gone.
Tomorrow starts a short cycle of Dr's appointments. June has a routine check-up with Dr. N (chemo doctor), and on Thursday I get to see Dr. W (movement disorder specialist in Indianapolis).
| KINGS AND KINGDOMS | |
![]() | Bible Reading: 1 Kings 16:29-34 |
| V. 30: But Ahab son of Omri did what was evil in the LORD's sight more than all who were before him. (HCSB) | |
Things can always get worse--or so it seems. Some of my readers may know my contention that this present universe is the worst of all possible worlds, by which I don't mean the "logically worst," but the metaphysically worst that God needs to allow in order to bring about what ultimately will be the best of all possible worlds.
So, imagine a world β, which is the best of all possible worlds. We surely do not live in it. We live in α, the actual world. God is going to turn α into β, but to do so he needs to allow a certain amount of evil in order to demonstrate his sovereignty, both in grace and in punishment. How much? Just as much as it takes--no more and no less. Logically, there is a world γ in which there is even more evil than in α, but God will not allow γ if it is not necessary to bring about β. There is plenty of evil to cope with in α.
Just look at how the preceding kings of Israel had escalated their evil. Jeroboam set the standard, and the next three kings all followed his example; Zimri wasn't around long enough to make a fair assessment, but he definitely showed no promise of improvement. Then Omri raised the bar (v. 25), and now Ahab is about to set a new record in apostasy. The golden calves had lost their appeal; Ahab instituted a whole new state religion, at least it was new for Israel as a state religion. He married Jezebel, princess of Sidon, and made her religion, the worship of Baal, the official religion for the northern kingdom. (See the entry of August 13 for a quick overview of Canaanite deities.)
If my previous analysis is correct, God is going to put a stop to this downward spiral, and that is precisely what will happen-- eventually. We're going to see God intervene more with Ahab than with any of the previous kings of Israel.
Mostly Not on the Nobel Peace Prize
It's not as though the NPP has had much credibility for quite a while now. But at least there has always been a rationale, no matter how twisted, for awarding it. At least Yassar Arafat, for example, made some meaningless gestures. Jimmy Carter put in many years of campaigning for the prize. (See, the inset for observations of a couple of years ago.) At this point, what else can one do than to congratulate President Obama on receiving (using an Indian political expression) a "scheduled" prize. Congratulations, Sir!
| Since it's not cached on the web, allow me to reproduce my sentiments of two years ago: So, Al Gore won the Nobel Peace Prize, along with the U.N. Panel on Climate Change, for his work on publicizing global warming. The Times (of London) On-line reports that predictably the Democrats are interpreting the award as a rebuke of President Bush, who does not share Gore's views. The Nobel Peace Prize has been somewhat questionable off and on anyway. It is instructive to look at the list of former winners and consider how many laureates were of rather dubious character, who received the prize for some single gesture, which the rest of their entire lives repudiated. Yassir Arafat and Menachem Begin both were leaders of terrorist gangs. In his autobiography, written after his meetings with Begin, Anwar Sadat still gloried in the destruction he had caused by the Yom Kippur war. Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev couldn't keep the Soviet Union together, even by taking military action against Lithuania; so, after losing the Cold War, he was given the Peace Prize for ending it. That's kind of like giving it to Hitler for ending World War II (which, I hasten to clarify, did not happen). The man who stood in Berlin and said, "Mr. Gorbachev, take down this wall!" and who really ended the Cold War, was overlooked. What I'm getting at is that the Democrats who are using the Prize as a jaded piece of propaganda are not really cheapening it; sadly, they are acting entirely in accord with the ideology that seems to be intrinsic to the Prize. Given the notoriety of the Nobel Peace Prize, one cannot ignore it. At least one wishes that it would be awarded to people who really are working for peace. Let me make a serious suggestion: The Prize should go to the two Ahmadyya sects of Islam, who are maintaining a solid pacifist stance, and who have always decried Islamic terrorism, not just when it's been a pragmatic PR move. It would appear to me that they aren't being true to the Qur'an, but that's all the better for them. They should be acknowledged and rewarded for their teaching, derived from their founder Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (1839 -1908 ) . |
So, the bottom line is that I shall not devote this entry to the Nobel prize. Instead, let me talk about the Islamic group(s) that should receive the Nobel prize, namely the adherents of Ahmadiyya Islam. What follows is a rescension of an article in a dictionary on religious sects that may eventually be published by Baker Book House.
Ahmadiyya is an Islamic sect based on the nineteenth-century reformer, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (1839–1908 ), who proclaimed himself to be both messiah and Mahdi.
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad lived in the Punjabi region. He was born in 1835 in a small village called Qadiyan. Ahmad first came to the attention of the greater Islamic world in 1880 with the publication of an exposition entitled Barahin-i-Ahmadiyya (The Blessings of Ahmad). I should clarify that Ahmadiyya (and consequently the name of the movement) does not actually refer to Ghulam Ahmad, but to the prophet Muhammad.
A few years later Ghulam Ahmad announced to the world that he was the Mahdi as well as the second coming of Jesus Christ. This version of the Mahdi is not the same as the Shi’ite one, where the Mahdi is the returning Imam, presently in occultation. Here it refers to the general belief that shortly before the last judgment a great leader will appear who will establish Islamic peace and justice all over the world. Sometimes this belief is also associated with a second coming of Christ alongside the Mahdi. Ghulam Ahmad professed that he was both.
Now, we need to be careful to understand what Ghulam Ahmad probably meant with these assertions. His claim to be the Mahdi was unbending, and there is no question that he saw himself as having fulfilled the prophecies of Christ’s second coming. But this latter contention did not mean that he thought he was Jesus Christ as understood by Christians, that is to say the incarnate second person of the Trinity. Rather, it meant that he, the Islamic Mahdi, also fulfilled the Christians’ anticipations of their future hope.
A few years before his death, Ahmad added to his claims by stating that “to the Hindus I am Krishna.” But again, what he most likely meant by that statement was simply that he fulfilled Hinduism’s expectations of Krishna’s return (or a little more accurately, a future incarnation of Vishnu, as promised in the Bhagavad Gita), not that he was a Hindu god—an idea totally inconsistent with his devotion to Islam.
Ghulam Ahmad attracted a sizable number of followers, who had to undergo an initiation ceremony (baya) into his movement, which consisted of taking a vow of unyielding adherence to Islam, as well as obedience to Ghulam Ahmad, and the latter would take precedence over all other human relationships. He taught his disciples to be strict in their observances, to relate to each other with love, and to avoid violence at all costs. The Qur’an, as Ahmad and his subsequent movement interpret it, never permits physical violence, let alone a military jihad, no matter how dire the circumstances may be.
Soon after Ghulam Ahmad died, dissension among his followers surfaced, and in 1914 a permanent split occurred,over the issue of the identity of Ahmad himself. No one questioned whether he was the Mahdi and messiah, but did that make him a full prophet? If so, he would be on a par with Muhammad, and all Muslims would be obliged to follow him. If not, he would simply be a great reformer, and the movement could retain partnership with Muslims around the world.
One side took the more radical view that Ghulam Ahmad was, in fact, a prophet, and that his movement was the only true expression of Islam. This group has become known by Ahmad’s town of birth as the “Qadiyanis.” Their leaders claim the title of “caliph”; they believe that only those who recognize Ahmad are genuine Muslims. Everyone else is kafir, an unbeliever. Consequently, Qadiyani Ahmadis are not permitted to identify themselves as Muslims in Pakistan.
The other group came to be known by the name of the city that houses their headquarters, Lahore, Pakistan. The Lahore group emphasizes the need for a pure, reformed Islam as taught by Ghulam Ahmad, but it identifies with mainstream Islam. They take the view that Ahmad was a reformer only, and that Muhammad was the last genuine prophet.
Both groups of Ahmadis are very active in attempting to reach new converts. In the context of the early twenty-first century, when many Muslims are attempting to rationalize or excuse acts of terrorism that have been committed in the name of Islam, the Ahmadiyya movement can claim greater credibility because of its consistent renunciation of violence.